tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1974893846640978769.post4304432804400541655..comments2023-09-26T07:35:33.224-07:00Comments on daggatt blog: fox news destroys world economyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1974893846640978769.post-10839123037421055522009-03-30T21:51:00.000-07:002009-03-30T21:51:00.000-07:00If anything destroys the economy, it may well be t...If anything destroys the economy, it may well be the uncertainty in the markets caused by the U.S. government's desire to meddle in the markets and "after the fact" decide to impose rules like higher tax rates on bonuses or salary caps on ceos. <BR/><BR/>Leave it to big government to run businesses worse than the businesses they are taking over for being run badly. And how cute to set the rules after the bailout, rather than before. That always inspires stability in the markets.Uncle Robhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13191730830991297118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1974893846640978769.post-11679612553938736012009-03-24T05:36:00.000-07:002009-03-24T05:36:00.000-07:00What We're Reading23 Mar 2009 - 05:511 Fox News de...What We're Reading<BR/>23 Mar 2009 - 05:51<BR/><BR/>1 Fox News destroys world economy <BR/><BR/>http://thebrowser.com/category/writer/tim-coldwellpolit2khttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08184279620350984044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1974893846640978769.post-27560271590618917652009-03-23T20:46:00.000-07:002009-03-23T20:46:00.000-07:00Fox wants the U.S. to fail. However, they can't ex...Fox wants the U.S. to fail. However, they can't explain the difference between Democratic and Republican economies.<BR/><BR/>If tax cuts for the rich are so good, why did the Dow and 401ks more than triple under Clinton and decrease by 30% under Bush? There never was a dot.com company in the Dow. <BR/><BR/>If tax cuts for the rich are so good, why did non-farm employment increase by almost 23 million jobs under Clinton and only 2 million under Bush?<BR/><BR/>If tax cuts for the rich are so good, why did manufacturing employment increase by 300,000 under Clinton and decrease by 4.4 million under Bush 2 and decrease by 1.3 million under Bush 1?<BR/><BR/>If tax cuts for the rich are so good, why did we end with surpluses under Clinton and trillion dollar deficits under Bush?dalekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11539285011346887422noreply@blogger.com